Paper detail

Euclidean correlations in combinatorial optimization problems: a statistical physics approach

In this thesis I discuss combinatorial optimization problems, from the statistical physics perspective. The starting point are the motivations which brought physicists together with computer scientists and mathematicians to work on this beautiful and deep topic. I give some elements of complexity theory, and I motivate why the point of view of statistical physics leads to many interesting results, as well as new questions. I discuss the connection between combinatorial optimization problems and spin glasses. Finally, I briefly review some topics of large deviation theory, as a way to go beyond average quantities. As a concrete example of this, I show how the replica method can be used to explore the large deviations of a well-known toy model of spin glasses, the p-spin spherical model. In the second chapter I specialize in Euclidean combinatorial optimization problems. In particular, I explain why these problems, when embedded in a finite dimensional Euclidean space, are difficult to deal with. I analyze several specific problems in one dimension to explain a quite general technique to deal with one dimensional Euclidean combinatorial optimization problems. Whenever possible, and in a detailed way for the traveling-salesman-problem case, I also discuss how to proceed in two (and also more) dimensions. In the last chapter I outline a promising approach to tackle hard combinatorial optimization problems: quantum computing. After giving a quick overview of the paradigm of quantum computation, I discuss in detail the application of the so-called quantum annealing algorithm to a specific case of the matching problem, also by providing a comparison between the performance of a recent quantum annealer machine and a classical super-computer equipped with an heuristic algorithm. Finally, I draw the conclusions of my work and I suggest some interesting directions for future studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.