Researcher profile

Andrea Di Gioacchino

Andrea Di Gioacchino contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Euclidean correlations in combinatorial optimization problems: a statistical physics approach

In this thesis I discuss combinatorial optimization problems, from the statistical physics perspective. The starting point are the motivations which brought physicists together with computer scientists and mathematicians to work on this beautiful and deep topic. I give some elements of complexity theory, and I motivate why the point of view of statistical physics leads to many interesting results, as well as new questions. I discuss the connection between combinatorial optimization problems and spin glasses. Finally, I briefly review some topics of large deviation theory, as a way to go beyond average quantities. As a concrete example of this, I show how the replica method can be used to explore the large deviations of a well-known toy model of spin glasses, the p-spin spherical model. In the second chapter I specialize in Euclidean combinatorial optimization problems. In particular, I explain why these problems, when embedded in a finite dimensional Euclidean space, are difficult to deal with. I analyze several specific problems in one dimension to explain a quite general technique to deal with one dimensional Euclidean combinatorial optimization problems. Whenever possible, and in a detailed way for the traveling-salesman-problem case, I also discuss how to proceed in two (and also more) dimensions. In the last chapter I outline a promising approach to tackle hard combinatorial optimization problems: quantum computing. After giving a quick overview of the paradigm of quantum computation, I discuss in detail the application of the so-called quantum annealing algorithm to a specific case of the matching problem, also by providing a comparison between the performance of a recent quantum annealer machine and a classical super-computer equipped with an heuristic algorithm. Finally, I draw the conclusions of my work and I suggest some interesting directions for future studies.

preprint2020arXiv

Perils of Embedding for Sampling Problems

Advances in techniques for thermal sampling in classical and quantum systems would deepen understanding of the underlying physics. Unfortunately, one often has to rely solely on inexact numerical simulation, due to the intractability of computing the partition function in many systems of interest. Emerging hardware, such as quantum annealers, provide novel tools for such investigations, but it is well known that studying general, non-native systems on such devices requires graph minor embedding, at the expense of introducing additional variables. The effect of embedding for sampling is more pronounced than for optimization; for optimization one is just concerned with the ground state physics, whereas for sampling one needs to consider states at all energies. We argue that as the system size or the embedding size grows, the chance of a sample being in the subspace of interest - the logical subspace - can be exponentially suppressed. Though the severity of this scaling can be lessened through favorable parameter choices, certain physical constraints (such as a fixed temperature and range of couplings) provide hard limits on what is currently feasible. Furthermore, we show that up to some practical and reasonable assumptions, any type of post-processing to project samples back into the logical subspace will bias the resulting statistics. We introduce a new such technique, based on resampling, that substantially outperforms majority vote, which is shown to fail quite dramatically at preserving distribution properties.