Paper detail

Estimation of f-wave Dominant Frequency Using a Voting Scheme

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart arrhythmia, characterized by the presence of fibrillatory waves (f-waves) in the ECG. We introduce a voting scheme to estimate the dominant atrial frequency (DAF) of f-waves. Methods: We analysed a subset of Holter recordings obtained from the University of Virginia AF Database. 100 Holter recordings with manually annotated AF events, resulting in a total 363 AF events lasting more than 1 min. The f-waves were extracted using four different template subtraction (TS) algorithms and the DAF was estimated from the first 1-min window of each AF event. A random forest classifier was used. We hypothesized that better extraction of the f-wave meant better AF/non-AF classification using the DAF as the single input feature of the RF model. Results: Performance on the test set, expressed in terms of AF/non-AF classification, was the best when the DAF was computed computed the three best-performing extraction methods. Using these three algorithms in a voting scheme, the classifier obtained AUC=0.60 and the DAFs were mostly spread around 6 Hz, 5.66 (4.83-7.47). Conclusions: This study has two novel contributions: (1) a method for assessing the performance of f-wave extraction algorithms, and (2) a voting scheme for improved DAF estimation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.