Paper detail

Estimation of distribution functions in measurement error models

Many practical problems are related to the pointwise estimation of dis- tribution functions when data contains measurement errors. Motivation for these problems comes from diverse fields such as astronomy, reliability, quality control, public health and survey data. Recently, Dattner, Goldenshluger and Juditsky (2011) showed that an estimator based on a direct inversion formula for distribution functions has nice properties when the tail of the characteristic function of the mea- surement error distribution decays polynomially. In this paper we derive theoretical properties for this estimator for the case where the error distri- bution is smoother and study its finite sample behavior for different error distributions. Our method is data-driven in the sense that we use only known information, namely, the error distribution and the data. Applica- tion of the estimator to estimating hypertension prevalence based on real data is also examined.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.