Paper detail

Estimating trans-ancestry genetic correlation with unbalanced data resources

The aim of this paper is to propose a novel estimation method of using genetic-predicted observations to estimate trans-ancestry genetic correlations, which describes how genetic architecture of complex traits varies among populations, in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Our new estimator corrects for prediction errors caused by high-dimensional weak GWAS signals, while addressing the heterogeneity of GWAS data across ethnicities, such as linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences, which can lead to biased findings in homogeneity-agnostic analyses. Moreover, our estimator only requires one population to have a large GWAS sample size, and the second population can only have a much smaller number of participants (for example, hundreds). It is designed to specifically address the unbalanced data resources such that the GWAS sample size for European populations is usually larger than that of non-European ancestry groups. Extensive simulations and real data analyses of 30 complex traits in the UK Biobank study show that our method is capable of providing reliable estimates of a wide range of complex traits. Our results provide deep insights into the transferability of population-specific genetic findings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.