Paper detail

Estimating the relevance of predictions from nuclear mean-field models

This contribution reviews the present status of the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock (SHF) approach as one of the leading self-consistent mean-field models in the physics of atomic nuclei. It starts with a brief summary of the formalism and strategy for proper calibration of the SHF functional. The main emphasis lies on an exploration of the reliability of predictions, particularly in the regime of extrapolations. Various strategies are discussed to explore the statistical and systematic errors of SHF. The strategies are illustrated on examples from actual applications. Variations of model and fit data are used to get an idea about systematic errors. The statistical error is evaluated in straightforward manner by statistical analysis based on $χ^2$ fits. This also allows also to evaluate the correlations (covariances) between observables which provides useful insights into the structure of the model and of the fitting strategy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.