Paper detail

Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses with application in microarray data

A new formulation for the proportion of true null hypotheses $(π_0)$, based on the sum of all $p$-values and the average of expected $p$-value under the false null hypotheses has been proposed in the current work. This formulation of the parameter of interest $π_0$ has also been used to construct a new estimator for the same. The proposed estimator removes the problem of choosing tuning parameters in the existing estimators. Though the formulation is quite general, computation of the new estimator demands use of an initial estimate of $π_0$. The issue of choosing an appropriate initial estimator is also discussed in this work. The current work assumes normality of each gene expression level and also assumes similar tests for all the hypotheses. Extensive simulation study shows that, the proposed estimator performs better than its closest competitor, the estimator proposed in Cheng et al., 2015 over a substantial continuous subinterval of the parameter space, under independence and weak dependence among the gene expression levels. The proposed method of estimation is applied to two real gene expression level data-sets and the results are in line with what is obtained by the competing method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.