Paper detail

Estimating the probability that a given vector is in the convex hull of a random sample

For a $d$-dimensional random vector $X$, let $p_{n, X}(θ)$ be the probability that the convex hull of $n$ independent copies of $X$ contains a given point $θ$. We provide several sharp inequalities regarding $p_{n, X}(θ)$ and $N_X(θ)$ denoting the smallest $n$ for which $p_{n, X}(θ)\ge1/2$. As a main result, we derive the totally general inequality $1/2 \le α_X(θ)N_X(θ)\le 3d + 1$, where $α_X(θ)$ (a.k.a. the Tukey depth) is the minimum probability that $X$ is in a fixed closed halfspace containing the point $θ$. We also show several applications of our general results: one is a moment-based bound on $N_X(\mathbb{E}[X])$, which is an important quantity in randomized approaches to cubature construction or measure reduction problem. Another application is the determination of the canonical convex body included in a random convex polytope given by independent copies of $X$, where our combinatorial approach allows us to generalize existing results in random matrix community significantly.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.