Paper detail

Estimating the Capacities of Function-as-a-Service Functions

Serverless computing is a cloud computing paradigm that allows developers to focus exclusively on business logic as cloud service providers manage resource management tasks. Serverless applications follow this model, where the application is decomposed into a set of fine-grained Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) functions. However, the obscurities of the underlying system infrastructure and dependencies between FaaS functions within the application pose a challenge for estimating the performance of FaaS functions. To characterize the performance of a FaaS function that is relevant for the user, we define Function Capacity (FC) as the maximal number of concurrent invocations the function can serve in a time without violating the Service-Level Objective (SLO). The paper addresses the challenge of quantifying the FC individually for each FaaS function within a serverless application. This challenge is addressed by sandboxing a FaaS function and building its performance model. To this end, we develop FnCapacitor - an end-to-end automated Function Capacity estimation tool. We demonstrate the functioning of our tool on Google Cloud Functions (GCF) and AWS Lambda. FnCapacitor estimates the FCs on different deployment configurations (allocated memory & maximum function instances) by conducting time-framed load tests and building various models using statistical: linear, ridge, and polynomial regression, and Deep Neural Network (DNN) methods on the acquired performance data. Our evaluation of different FaaS functions shows relatively accurate predictions, with an accuracy greater than 75% using DNN for both cloud providers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.