Paper detail

Estimating Subgraph Frequencies with or without Attributes from Egocentrically Sampled Data

In this paper we show how to efficiently produce unbiased estimates of subgraph frequencies from a probability sample of egocentric networks (i.e., focal nodes, their neighbors, and the induced subgraphs of ties among their neighbors). A key feature of our proposed method that differentiates it from prior methods is the use of egocentric data. Because of this, our method is suitable for estimation in large unknown graphs, is easily parallelizable, handles privacy sensitive network data (e.g. egonets with no neighbor labels), and supports counting of large subgraphs (e.g. maximal clique of size 205 in Section 6) by building on top of existing exact subgraph counting algorithms that may not support sampling. It gracefully handles a variety of sampling designs such as uniform or weighted independence or random walk sampling. Our method can be used for subgraphs that are: (i) undirected or directed; (ii) induced or non-induced; (iii) maximal or non-maximal; and (iv) potentially annotated with attributes. We compare our estimators on a variety of real-world graphs and sampling methods and provide suggestions for their use. Simulation shows that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art approach for relative subgraph frequencies by up to an order of magnitude for the same sample size. Finally, we apply our methodology to a rare sample of Facebook users across the social graph to estimate and interpret the clique size distribution and gender composition of cliques.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.