Paper detail

Estimating intermittency in three-dimensional Navier-Stokes turbulence

The issue of why computational resolution in Navier-Stokes turbulence is so hard to achieve is addressed. It is shown that Navier-Stokes solutions can potentially behave differently in two distinct regions of space-time $\mathbb{R}^{\pm}$ where $\mathbb{R}^{-}$ is comprised of a union of disjoint space-time `anomalies'. Large values of $|\nabla\bom|$ dominate $\mathbb{R}^{-}$, which is consistent with the formation of vortex sheets or tightly-coiled filaments. The local number of degrees of freedom $\mathcal{N}^{\pm}$ needed to resolve the regions in $\mathbb{R}^{\pm}$ satisfies $$\mathcal{N}^{\pm}(\bx, t)\lessgtr c_{\pm}\mathcal{R}_{u}^{3}$$ where $\mathcal{R}_{u} = uL/ν$ is a Reynolds number dependent on the local velocity field $u(\bx, t)$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.