Paper detail

Essential normality, essential norms and hyperrigidity

Let $S = (S_1, \ldots, S_d)$ denote the compression of the $d$-shift to the complement of a homogeneous ideal $I$ of $\mathbb{C}[z_1, \ldots, z_d]$. Arveson conjectured that $S$ is essentially normal. In this paper, we establish new results supporting this conjecture, and connect the notion of essential normality to the theory of the C*-envelope and the noncommutative Choquet boundary. The unital norm closed algebra $\mathcal{B}_I$ generated by $S_1,\ldots,S_d$ modulo the compact operators is shown to be completely isometrically isomorphic to the uniform algebra generated by polynomials on $\overline{V} := \overline{\mathcal{Z}(I) \cap \mathbb{B}_d}$, where $\mathcal{Z}(I)$ is the variety corresponding to $I$. Consequently, the essential norm of an element in $\mathcal{B}_I$ is equal to the sup norm of its Gelfand transform, and the C*-envelope of $\mathcal{B}_I$ is identified as the algebra of continuous functions on $\overline{V} \cap \partial \mathbb{B}_d$, which means it is a complete invariant of the topology of the variety determined by $I$ in the ball. Motivated by this determination of the C*-envelope of $\mathcal{B}_I$, we suggest a new, more qualitative approach to the problem of essential normality. We prove the tuple $S$ is essentially normal if and only if it is hyperrigid as the generating set of a C*-algebra, which is a property closely connected to Arveson's notion of a boundary representation. We show that most of our results hold in a much more general setting. In particular, for most of our results, the ideal $I$ can be replaced by an arbitrary (not necessarily homogeneous) invariant subspace of the $d$-shift.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.