Paper detail

Escaping from cycles through a glass transition

A random walk is performed over a disordered media composed of $N$ sites random and uniformly distributed inside a $d$-dimensional hypercube. The walker cannot remain in the same site and hops to one of its $n$ neighboring sites with a transition probability that depends on the distance $D$ between sites according to a cost function $E(D)$. The stochasticity level is parametrized by a formal temperature $T$. In the case $T = 0$, the walk is deterministic and ergodicity is broken: the phase space is divided in a ${\cal O}(N)$ number of attractor basins of two-cycles that trap the walker. For $d = 1$, analytic results indicate the existence of a glass transition at $T_1 = 1/2$ as $N \to \infty$. Below $T_1$, the average trapping time in two-cycles diverges and out-of-equilibrium behavior appears. Similar glass transitions occur in higher dimensions choosing a proper cost function. We also present some results for the statistics of distances for Poisson spatial point processes.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.