Paper detail

Error-Free Multi-Valued Consensus with Byzantine Failures

In this paper, we present an efficient deterministic algorithm for consensus in presence of Byzantine failures. Our algorithm achieves consensus on an $L$-bit value with communication complexity $O(nL + n^4 L^{0.5} + n^6)$ bits, in a network consisting of $n$ processors with up to $t$ Byzantine failures, such that $t<n/3$. For large enough $L$, communication complexity of the proposed algorithm approaches $O(nL)$ bits. In other words, for large $L$, the communication complexity is linear in the number of processors in the network. This is an improvement over the work of Fitzi and Hirt (from PODC 2006), who proposed a probabilistically correct multi-valued Byzantine consensus algorithm with a similar complexity for large $L$. In contrast to the algorithm by Fitzi and Hirt, our algorithm is guaranteed to be always error-free. Our algorithm require no cryptographic technique, such as authentication, nor any secret sharing mechanism. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to show that, for large $L$, error-free multi-valued Byzantine consensus on an $L$-bit value is achievable with $O(nL)$ bits of communication.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.