Paper detail

Error Correction in Learning using SVMs

This paper is concerned with learning binary classifiers under adversarial label-noise. We introduce the problem of error-correction in learning where the goal is to recover the original clean data from a label-manipulated version of it, given (i) no constraints on the adversary other than an upper-bound on the number of errors, and (ii) some regularity properties for the original data. We present a simple and practical error-correction algorithm called SubSVMs that learns individual SVMs on several small-size (log-size), class-balanced, random subsets of the data and then reclassifies the training points using a majority vote. Our analysis reveals the need for the two main ingredients of SubSVMs, namely class-balanced sampling and subsampled bagging. Experimental results on synthetic as well as benchmark UCI data demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. In addition to noise-tolerance, log-size subsampled bagging also yields significant run-time benefits over standard SVMs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.