Paper detail

Error Bounds and Applications for Stochastic Approximation with Non-Decaying Gain

This work analyzes the stochastic approximation algorithm with non-decaying gains as applied in time-varying problems. The setting is to minimize a sequence of scalar-valued loss functions $f_k(\cdot)$ at sampling times $τ_k$ or to locate the root of a sequence of vector-valued functions $g_k(\cdot)$ at $τ_k$ with respect to a parameter $θ\in R^p$. The available information is the noise-corrupted observation(s) of either $f_k(\cdot)$ or $g_k(\cdot)$ evaluated at one or two design points only. Given the time-varying stochastic approximation setup, we apply stochastic approximation algorithms with non-decaying gains, so that the recursive estimate denoted as $\hatθ_k$ can maintain its momentum in tracking the time-varying optimum denoted as $θ_k^*$. Chapter 3 provides a bound for the root-mean-squared error $ \sqrt{E(\|\hatθ_k-θ_k^*\|^2})$. Overall, the bounds are applicable under a mild assumption on the time-varying drift and a modest restriction on the observation noise and the bias term. After establishing the tracking capability in Chapter 3, we also discuss the concentration behavior of $\hatθ_k $ in Chapter 4. The weak convergence limit of the continuous interpolation of $\hatθ_k$ is shown to follow the trajectory of a non-autonomous ordinary differential equation. Both Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 are probabilistic arguments and may not provide much guidance on the gain-tuning strategies useful for one single experiment run. Therefore, Chapter 5 discusses a data-dependent gain-tuning strategy based on estimating the Hessian information and the noise level. Overall, this work answers the questions "what is the estimate for the dynamical system $θ_k^*$" and "how much we can trust $\hatθ_k $ as an estimate for $θ_k^*$."

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.