Paper detail

Error Bound of Empirical $\ell_2$ Risk Minimization for Noisy Standard and Generalized Phase Retrieval Problems

In this paper, we study the estimation performance of empirical $\ell_2$ risk minimization (ERM) in noisy (standard) phase retrieval (NPR) given by $y_k = |α_k^*x_0|^2+η_k$, or noisy generalized phase retrieval (NGPR) formulated as $y_k = x_0^*A_kx_0 + η_k$, where $x_0\in\mathbb{K}^d$ is the desired signal, $n$ is the sample size, $η= (η_1,...,η_n)^\top$ is the noise vector. We establish new error bounds under different noise patterns, and our proofs are valid for both $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{C}$. In NPR under arbitrary noise vector $η$, we derive a new error bound $O\big(\|η\|_\infty\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}} + \frac{|\mathbf{1}^\topη|}{n}\big)$, which is tighter than the currently known one $O\big(\frac{\|η\|}{\sqrt{n}}\big)$ in many cases. In NGPR, we show $O\big(\|η\|\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n}\big)$ for arbitrary $η$. In both problems, the bounds for arbitrary noise immediately give rise to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}})$ for sub-Gaussian or sub-exponential random noise, with some conventional but inessential assumptions (e.g., independent or zero-mean condition) removed or weakened. In addition, we make a first attempt to ERM under heavy-tailed random noise assumed to have bounded $l$-th moment. To achieve a trade-off between bias and variance, we truncate the responses and propose a corresponding robust ERM estimator, which is shown to possess the guarantee $\tilde{O}\big(\big[\sqrt{\frac{d}{n}}\big]^{1-1/l}\big)$ in both NPR, NGPR. All the error bounds straightforwardly extend to the more general problems of rank-$r$ matrix recovery, and these results deliver a conclusion that the full-rank frame $\{A_k\}_{k=1}^n$ in NGPR is more robust to biased noise than the rank-1 frame $\{α_kα_k^*\}_{k=1}^n$ in NPR. Extensive experimental results are presented to illustrate our theoretical findings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.