Paper detail

Erasure/list exponents for Slepian-Wolf decoding

We analyze random coding error exponents associated with erasure/list Slepian-Wolf decoding using two different methods and then compare the resulting bounds. The first method follows the well known techniques of Gallager and Forney and the second method is based on a technique of distance enumeration, or more generally, type class enumeration, which is rooted in the statistical mechanics of a disordered system that is related to the random energy model (REM). The second method is guaranteed to yield exponent functions which are at least as tight as those of the first method, and it is demonstrated that for certain combinations of coding rates and thresholds, the bounds of the second method are strictly tighter than those of the first method, by an arbitrarily large factor. In fact, the second method may even yield an infinite exponent at regions where the first method gives finite values. We also discuss the option of variable-rate Slepian-Wolf encoding and demonstrate how it can improve on the resulting exponents.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.