Paper detail

Equivariant Passing-Bablok regression in quasilinear time

Passing-Bablok regression is a standard tool for method and assay comparison studies thanks to its place in industry guidelines such as CLSI. Unfortunately, its computational cost is high as a naive approach requires O(n2) time. This makes it impossible to compute the Passing-Bablok regression estimator on large datasets. Additionally, even on smaller datasets it can be difficult to perform bootstrap-based inference. We introduce the first quasilinear time algorithm for the equivariant Passing-Bablok estimator. In contrast to the naive algorithm, our algorithm runs in O(n log(n)) expected time using O(n) space, allowing for its application to much larger data sets. Additionally, we introduce a fast estimator for the variance of the Passing-Bablok slope and discuss statistical inference based on bootstrap and this variance estimate. Finally, we propose a diagnostic plot to identify influential points in Passing-Bablok regression. The superior performance of the proposed methods is illustrated on real data examples of clinical method comparison studies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.