Paper detail

Equivalent definitions of dyadic Muckenhoupt and Reverse Hölder classes in terms of Carleson sequences, weak classes, and comparability of dyadic $L\log L$ and $A_\infty$ constants

In the dyadic case the union of the Reverse Hölder classes, $RH_p^d$ is strictly larger than the union of the Muckenhoupt classes $ A_p^d$. We introduce the $RH_1^d$ condition as a limiting case of the $RH_p^d$ inequalities as $p$ tends to 1 and show the sharp bound on $RH_1^d$ constant of the weight $w$ in terms of its $A_\infty^d$ constant. We also take a look at the summation conditions of the Buckley type for the dyadic Reverse Hölder and Muckenhoupt weights and deduce them from an intrinsic lemma which gives a summation representation of the bumped average of a weight. Our lemmata also allow us to obtain summation conditions for continuous Reverse Hölder and Muckenhoupt classes of weights and both continuous and dyadic weak Reverse Hölder classes. In particular, it shows that a weight belongs to the class $RH_1$ if and only if it satisfies Buckley's inequality. We also show that the constant in each summation inequality of Buckley's type is comparable to the corresponding Muckenhoupt or Reverse Hölder constant.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.