Paper detail

Equilibrium behavior in a nonequilibrium system: Ising-doped voter model on complete graph

While the Ising model belongs to the realm of equilibrium statistical mechanics, the voter model is an example of a nonequilibrium system. We examine an opinion formation model, which is a mixture of Ising and voter agents with concentrations $p$ and $1-p$, respectively. Although in our model for $p<1$ a detailed balance is violated, on a complete graph the average magnetization in the stationary state for any $p>0$ is shown to satisfy the same equation as for the pure Ising model ($p=1$). Numerical simulations confirm such a behavior, but the equivalence with the pure Ising model apparently holds only for magnetization. Susceptibility in our model diverges at the temperature at which magnetization vanishes, but its values depend on the concentration~$p$. Simulations on a random graph also show that a small concentration of Ising agents is sufficient to induce a ferromagnetic ordering.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.