Paper detail

Envelopes and principal component regression

Envelope methods offer targeted dimension reduction for various models. The overarching goal is to improve efficiency in multivariate parameter estimation by projecting the data onto a lower-dimensional subspace known as the envelope. Envelope approaches have advantages in analyzing data with highly correlated variables, but their iterative Grassmannian optimization algorithms do not scale very well with ultra high-dimensional data. While the connections between envelopes and partial least squares in multivariate linear regression have promoted recent progress in high-dimensional studies of envelopes, we propose a more straightforward way of envelope modeling from a novel principal components regression perspective. The proposed procedure, Non-Iterative Envelope Component Estimation (NIECE), has excellent computational advantages over the iterative Grassmannian optimization alternatives in high dimensions. We develop a unified NIECE theory that bridges the gap between envelope methods and principal components in regression. The new theoretical insights also shed light on the envelope subspace estimation error as a function of eigenvalue gaps of two symmetric positive definite matrices used in envelope modeling. We apply the new theory and algorithm to several envelope models, including response and predictor reduction in multivariate linear models, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard model. Simulations and illustrative data analysis show the potential for NIECE to improve standard methods in linear and generalized linear models significantly.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.