Paper detail

Entropy numbers of embeddings of Schatten classes

Let $0<p,q \leq \infty$ and denote by $\mathcal S_p^N$ and $\mathcal S_q^N$ the corresponding finite-dimensional Schatten classes. We prove optimal bounds, up to constants only depending on $p$ and $q$, for the entropy numbers of natural embeddings between $\mathcal S_p^N$ and $\mathcal S_q^N$. This complements the known results in the classical setting of natural embeddings between finite-dimensional $\ell_p$ spaces due to Schütt, Edmunds-Triebel, Triebel and Guédon-Litvak/Kühn. We present a rather short proof that uses all the known techniques as well as a constructive proof of the upper bound in the range $N\leq n\leq N^2$ that allows deeper structural insight and is therefore interesting in its own right. Our main result can also be used to provide an alternative proof of recent lower bounds in the area of low-rank matrix recovery.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.