Paper detail

Ensuring 'well-balanced' shallow water flows via a discontinuous Galerkin finite element method: issues at lowest order

The discontinuous Galerkin finite element method (DGFEM) developed by Rhebergen et al. (2008) offers a robust method for solving systems of nonconservative hyperbolic partial differential equations but, as we show here, does not satisfactorily deal with topography in shallow water flows at lowest order (so-called DG0, or equivalently finite volume). In particular, numerical solutions of the space-DG0 discretised one-dimensional shallow water equations over varying topography are not truly `well-balanced'. A numerical scheme is well-balanced if trivial steady states are satisfied in the numerical solution; in the case of the shallow water equations, initialised rest flow should remain at rest for all times. Whilst the free-surface height and momentum remain constant and zero, respectively, suggesting that the scheme is indeed well-balanced, the fluid depth and topography evolve in time. This is both undesirable and unphysical, leading to incorrect numerical solutions for the fluid depth, and is thus a concern from a predictive modelling perspective. We expose this unsatisfactory issue, both analytically and numerically, and indicate a solution that combines the DGFEM formulation for nonconservative products with a fast and stable well-balanced finite-volume method. This combined scheme bypasses the offending issue and successfully integrates nonconservative hyperbolic shallow water-type models with varying topography at lowest order. We briefly discuss implications for the definition of a well-balanced scheme, and highlight applications when higher-order schemes may not be desired, which give further value to our finding beyond its exposure alone.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.