Paper detail

Enhancing Backdoor Attacks with Multi-Level MMD Regularization

While Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) excel in many tasks, the huge training resources they require become an obstacle for practitioners to develop their own models. It has become common to collect data from the Internet or hire a third party to train models. Unfortunately, recent studies have shown that these operations provide a viable pathway for maliciously injecting hidden backdoors into DNNs. Several defense methods have been developed to detect malicious samples, with the common assumption that the latent representations of benign and malicious samples extracted by the infected model exhibit different distributions. However, a comprehensive study on the distributional differences is missing. In this paper, we investigate such differences thoroughly via answering three questions: 1) What are the characteristics of the distributional differences? 2) How can they be effectively reduced? 3) What impact does this reduction have on difference-based defense methods? First, the distributional differences of multi-level representations on the regularly trained backdoored models are verified to be significant by introducing Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), Energy Distance (ED), and Sliced Wasserstein Distance (SWD) as the metrics. Then, ML-MMDR, a difference reduction method that adds multi-level MMD regularization into the loss, is proposed, and its effectiveness is testified on three typical difference-based defense methods. Across all the experimental settings, the F1 scores of these methods drop from 90%-100% on the regularly trained backdoored models to 60%-70% on the models trained with ML-MMDR. These results indicate that the proposed MMD regularization can enhance the stealthiness of existing backdoor attack methods. The prototype code of our method is now available at https://github.com/xpf/Multi-Level-MMD-Regularization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.