Paper detail

Enhancement of electron correlation due to the molecular dimerization in organic superconductors $β$-(BDA-TTP)$_{2}X$ ($X$=I$_3$, SbF$_6$)

We perform a first principles band calculation for quasi-two-dimensional organic superconductors $β$-(BDA-TTP)$_{2}$I$_{3}$ and $β$-(BDA-TTP)$_{2}$SbF$_{6}$. The first principles band structures between the I$_{3}$ and SbF$_{6}$ salts are apparently different. We construct a tight-binding model for each material which accurately reproduces the first principles band structure. The obtained transfer energies give the differences such as (i) larger dimerization in the I$_{3}$ salt than the SbF$_{6}$ salt, and (ii) different signs and directions of the inter-stacking transfer energies. To decompose the origin of the difference into the dimerization and the inter-stacking transfer energies, we adopt a simplified model by eliminating the dimerization effect and extract the difference caused by the inter-stacking transfer energies. From the analysis using the simplified model, we find that the difference of the band structure comes mainly from the strength of dimerization. To compare the strength of the electron correlation having roots in the band structure, we calculate the physical properties originated from the effect of the electron correlation such as the spin susceptibility applying two particle self-consistent (TPSC) method. We find that the maximum value of the spin susceptibility of the I$_{3}$ salt is larger than that of the SbF$_{6}$ salt. Hypothetically decreasing the dimerization within the model of the I$_{3}$ salt, the spin susceptibility takes almost the same value as that of the SbF$_6$ salt for the same magnitude of the dimerization. We expect that the different ground state between the I$_{3}$ and SbF$_{6}$ salt mainly comes from the strength of the dimerization which is apparently masked in the band calculation along a particular $k$-path.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.