Paper detail

Enhanced radiative efficiency in GaN nanowires grown on sputtered TiN$_{\boldsymbol{x}}$: effects of surface electric fields

GaN nanowires grown by molecular beam epitaxy generally suffer from dominant nonradiative recombination, which is believed to originate from point defects. To suppress the formation of these defects, we explore the synthesis of GaN nanowires at temperatures up to 915 $°C$ enabled by the use of thermally stable TiN$_x$/Al$_2$O$_3$ substrates. These samples exhibit indeed bound exciton decay times approaching those measured for state-of-the-art bulk GaN. However, the decay time is not correlated with the growth temperature, but rather with the nanowire diameter. The inverse dependence of the decay time on diameter suggests that the nonradiative process in GaN nanowires is not controlled by the defect density, but by the field ionization of excitons in the radial electric field caused by surface band bending. We propose a unified mechanism accounting for nonradiative recombination in GaN nanowires of arbitrary diameter.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.