Paper detail

Enhanced Performance Neutron Scattering Spectroscopy by Use of Correlation Techniques

Neutron correlation spectroscopy can exceed direct spectroscopy in the incoming beam intensity by up to two orders of magnitude at the same energy resolution. However, the propagation of the counting noise in the correlation algorithm of data reduction is disadvantageous for the lowest intensity parts of the observed spectrum. To mitigate this effect at pulsed neutron sources we propose two dimensional time-of-flight recording of each neutron detection event: with respect to both the neutron source pulses and to the rotation phase of the pseudo-random beam modulation statistical chopper. We have identified a formulation of the data reduction algorithm by matching the data processing time channel width to the inherent time resolution of this chopper, which makes the reconstruction of the direct time-of-flight spectra exact and independent of all other contributions to instrumental resolution. Two ways are proposed for most flexible choice of intensity vs. resolution without changing the statistical chopper or its speed: changing the size of the beam window during the experiment or varying intensity and resolution options in the data reduction algorithm after the experiment. This latter is a unique and very promising new potential offered by the correlation method. Furthermore, it displays reduced sensitivity to external background, also due to the much higher signal intensity. This is particularly advantageous for extending the operational range to higher neutron energies. In hot and thermal neutron vibrational spectroscopy, the statistical chopper approach allows us to achieve very significant gains in spectrometer efficiency compared to using conventional choppers. High intensity for the most intense features in the spectra and the reduced sensitivity to sample independent background make correlation spectroscopy a most powerful choice for studying small samples.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.