Paper detail

Energy relaxation rate of 2D hole gas in GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs quantum well within wide range of conductivitiy

The nonohmic conductivity of 2D hole gas (2DHG) in single $GaAsIn_{0.2}Ga_{0.8}AsGaAs$ quantum well structures within the temperature range of 1.4 - 4.2K, the carrier's densities $p=(1.5-8)\cdot10^{15}m^{-2}$ and a wide range of conductivities $(10^{-4}-100)G_0$ ($G_0=e^2/π\,h$) was investigated. It was shown that at conductivity $σ>G_0$ the energy relaxation rate $P(T_h,T_L)$ is well described by the conventional theory (P.J. Price J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6863 (1982)), which takes into account scattering on acoustic phonons with both piezoelectric and deformational potential coupling to holes. At the conductivity range $0.01G_0<σ<G_0$ energy the relaxation rate significantly deviates down from the theoretical value. The analysis of $\frac{dP}{dσ}$ at different lattice temperature $T_L$ shows that this deviation does not result from crossover to the hopping conductivity, which occurs at $σ<10^{-2}$, but from the Pippard ineffectiveness.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.