Paper detail

Energy localization and excess fluctuations from long-range interactions in equilibrium molecular dynamics

Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations of standard systems of interacting particles ("atoms") give excellent agreement with the equipartition theorem for the average energy, but we find that these simulations exhibit finite-size effects in the dynamics that cause local fluctuations in energy to deviate significantly from the analogous energy fluctuation relation (EFR). The main conclusion of our study is that systems separated into nanometer-sized "blocks" inside much larger simulations exhibit excess fluctuations in potential energy (pe) that diverge inversely proportional to T in a manner that is strongly dependent on the range of interaction. Specifically, at low T with long-range interactions pe fluctuations exceed the EFR by at least an order of magnitude, dropping abruptly to below the EFR when interactions include only 1st-neighbor atoms. A simplistic model that includes 2nd-neighbor interactions matches the behavior of the excess pe fluctuations, but only if the 2nd-neighbor terms are not included in Boltzmann's factor, attributable to energy localization due to anharmonic effects. Characterizing energy correlations as a function of time and distance reveals that excess pe fluctuations in a block coincide with negative pe correlations between neighboring blocks, whereas reduced pe fluctuations coincide with positive pe correlations. Indeed, anomalous pe fluctuations in small systems at low T can be quantified by using the net energy in Boltzmann's factor that includes the pe from a surrounding shell of similarly small systems, or equivalently an effective local temperature. Our analysis elucidates the source of non-Boltzmann fluctuations, and the need to include mesoscopic thermal effects from the local environment for a consistent theoretical description of the equilibrium fluctuations in MD simulations of standard models with long-range interactions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.