Paper detail

Energy Constraints for Evolving Spherical and Hyperbolic Wormholes in $f(R,T)$ Gravity

The primary objective of this article is to study the energy condition bounds for spherical and hyperbolic wormholes in well-known $f(R,T)$ theory of gravity. For this purpose, we formulate the field equations for spherically and pseudospherically geometries using anisotropic matter and linear form of generic function $f(R,T)$. By imposing different conditions on radial and tangential pressures or by adopting some known choices for red shift and shape functions, we present the graphical analysis of energy conditions for both spherically and pseudospherically symmetric wormholes. It is seen that energy density for spherically symmetric wormhole is always positive for $λ>-4π$ and $λ<-8π$, while the energy conditions for radial pressure are negative at throat. Likewise, in case of pseudospherically symmetric wormhole, it is observed that energy density is always positive for negative $λ$, however conditions based on radial pressure may be positive or negative for the considered different cases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.