Paper detail

Energy conservation of weak solutions for the incompressible Euler equations via vorticity

Motivated by the works of Cheskidov, Lopes Filho, Nussenzveig Lopes and Shvydkoy in [8, Commun. Math. Phys. 348: 129-143, 2016] and Chen and Yu in [5, J. Math. Pures Appl. 131: 1-16, 2019], we address how the $L^p$ control of vorticity could influence the energy conservation for the incompressible homogeneous and nonhomogeneous Euler equations in this paper. For the homogeneous flow in the periodic domain or whole space, we provide a self-contained proof for the criterion $ω=\text{curl}u\in L^{3}(0,T;L^{\frac{3n}{n+2}}(Ω))\,(n=2,3)$, which generalizes the corresponding result in [8] and can be viewed as in Onsager critical spatio-temporal spaces. Regarding the nonhomogeneous flow, it is shown that the energy is conserved as long as the vorticity lies in the same space as before and $\nabla\sqrtρ$ belongs to $L^{\infty}(0,T;L^{n}(\mathbb{T}^{n}))\,(n=2,3)$, which gives an affirmative answer to a problem proposed by Chen and Yu in [5].

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.