Paper detail

Energy and Performance-Can a Wimpy-Node Cluster Challenge a Brawny Server?

Traditional DBMS servers are usually over-provisioned for most of their daily workloads and, because they do not show good energy proportionality, waste a lot of energy while underutilized. A cluster of small (wimpy) servers, where the number of nodes can dynamically adjust to the current workload, might offer better energy characteristics for these workloads. Yet, clusters suffer from "friction losses" and may not be able to quickly adapt to the workload, whereas a single, brawny server delivers performance instantaneously. In this paper, we compare a small cluster of lightweight nodes to a single server in terms of performance and energy efficiency. We run several benchmarks, consisting of OLTP and OLAP queries at variable utilization to test the system's ability to adjust to the workloads. To quantify possible energy saving and its conceivable drawback on query runtime, we evaluate our implementation on a cluster as well as on a single, brawny server and compare the results w.r.t. performance and energy consumption. Our findings confirm that - based on the workload - energy can be saved without sacrificing too much performance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.