Paper detail

Energy and centrality dependence of chemical freeze-out parameters from models

One of the main goals of heavy-ion collision experiments is to study the structure of the QCD phase diagram. The QCD phase diagram is typically plotted as temperature ($T$) vs. baryon chemical potential ($μ_{B}$). The statistical thermal model THERMUS compared to experimental data provides chemical freeze-out parameters such as temperature, baryon chemical potential and strangeness saturation factor ($γ_{s}$). However, the values of these parameters depend on models and their underlying assumptions, such as the nature of the ensemble used, particle ratios vs. particle yields, and the treatment of feed-down contributions to particle yields. In these proceedings, we report on a systematic study of chemical freeze-out parameters using THERMUS, as a function of collision centrality and collision energies ($\sqrt{s_{NN}} =7.7-200$ GeV). These studies are performed with the string melting version of A Multi-Phase Transport (AMPT) model. A comparison is presented of freeze-out parameters between grand-canonical vs. strangeness canonical ensembles, particle yields vs. ratios, with and without feed-down contributions to the particle yields. The main aim is to evaluate the sensitivity of the thermal model fits to various model assumptions. This is an important study for understanding corresponding experimental results from the beam energy scan program at RHIC.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.