Paper detail

Enabling Digitalization in Modular Robotic Systems Integration

Integrating robot systems into manufacturing lines is a time-consuming process. In the era of digitalization, the research and development of new technologies is crucial for improving integration processes. Numerous challenges, including the lack of standardization, as well as intricate stakeholder relationships, complicate the process of robotic systems integration. This process typically consists of acquisition, integration, and deployment of the robot systems. This thesis focuses on three areas that help automate and simplify robotic systems integration. In the first area, related to acquisition, a constraint-based configurator is demonstrated that resolves compatibility challenges between robot devices, and automates the configuration process. This reduces the risk of integrating incompatible devices and decreases the need for experts during the configuration phase. In the second area, related to integration, the interoperable modeling format, Unified Robot Description Format (URDF), is investigated, where a detailed analysis is performed, revealing significant inconsistencies and critical improvements. This format is widely used for kinematic modeling and 3D visualization of robots, and its models can be reused across simulation tools. Improving this format benefits a wide range of users, including robotics engineers, researchers, and students. In the third area, related to deployment, Digital Twins (DTs) for robot systems are explored, as these improve efficiency and reduce downtime. A comprehensive literature review of DTs is conducted, and a case study of modular robot systems is developed. This research can accelerate the adoption of DTs in the robotics industry. These insights and approaches improve the process of robotic systems integration, offering valuable contributions that future research can build upon, ultimately driving efficiency, and reducing costs.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.