Paper detail

Empowering Patients Using Smart Mobile Health Platforms: Evidence From A Randomized Field Experiment

With today's technological advancements, mobile phones and wearable devices have become extensions of an increasingly diffused and smart digital infrastructure. In this paper, we examine mobile health (mHealth) platforms and their health and economic impacts on the outcomes of chronic disease patients. We partnered with a major mHealth firm that provides one of the largest mHealth apps in Asia specializing in diabetes care. We designed a randomized field experiment based on detailed patient health activities (e.g., exercises, sleep, food intake) and blood glucose values from 1,070 diabetes patients over several months. We find the adoption of the mHealth app leads to an improvement in health behavior, which leads to both short term metrics (reduction in patients' blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels) and longer-term metrics (hospital visits and medical expenses). Patients who adopted the mHealth app undertook more exercise, consumed healthier food, walked more steps and slept for longer times. They also were more likely to substitute offline visits with telehealth. A comparison of mobile vs. PC version of the same app demonstrates that mobile has a stronger effect than PC in helping patients make these behavioral modifications with respect to diet, exercise and lifestyle, which leads to an improvement in their healthcare outcomes. We also compared outcomes when the platform facilitates personalized health reminders to patients vs. generic reminders. Surprisingly, we find personalized mobile messages with patient-specific guidance can have an inadvertent (smaller) effect on patient app engagement and lifestyle changes, leading to a lower health improvement. However, they are more like to encourage a substitution of offline visits by telehealth. Overall, our findings indicate the massive potential of mHealth technologies and platform design in achieving better healthcare outcomes.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.