Paper detail

Empirical Validation of the Buckley--Osthus Model for the Web Host Graph: Degree and Edge Distributions

There has been a lot of research on random graph models for large real-world networks such as those formed by hyperlinks between web pages in the world wide web. Though largely successful qualitatively in capturing their key properties, such models may lack important quantitative characteristics of Internet graphs. While preferential attachment random graph models were shown to be capable of reflecting the degree distribution of the webgraph, their ability to reflect certain aspects of the edge distribution was not yet well studied. In this paper, we consider the Buckley--Osthus implementation of preferential attachment and its ability to model the web host graph in two aspects. One is the degree distribution that we observe to follow the power law, as often being the case for real-world graphs. Another one is the two-dimensional edge distribution, the number of edges between vertices of given degrees. We fit a single "initial attractiveness" parameter $a$ of the model, first with respect to the degree distribution of the web host graph, and then, absolutely independently, with respect to the edge distribution. Surprisingly, the values of $a$ we obtain turn out to be nearly the same. Therefore the same model with the same value of the parameter $a$ fits very well the two independent and basic aspects of the web host graph. In addition, we demonstrate that other models completely lack the asymptotic behavior of the edge distribution of the web host graph, even when accurately capturing the degree distribution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt for a real graph of Internet to describe the distribution of edges between vertices with respect to their degrees.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.