Paper detail

Empirical Sampling of Connected Graph Partitions for Redistricting

The space of connected graph partitions underlies statistical models used as evidence in court cases and reform efforts that analyze political districting plans. In response to the demands of redistricting applications, researchers have developed sampling methods that traverse this space, building on techniques developed for statistical physics. In this paper, we study connections between redistricting and statistical physics, and in particular with self-avoiding walks. We exploit knowledge of phase transitions and asymptotic behavior in self avoiding walks to analyze two questions of crucial importance for Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis of districting plans. First, we examine mixing times of a popular Glauber dynamics based Markov chain and show how the self-avoiding walk phase transitions interact with mixing time. We examine factors new to the redistricting context that complicate the picture, notably the population balance requirements, connectivity requirements, and the irregular graphs used. Second, we analyze the robustness of the qualitative properties of typical districting plans with respect to score functions and a certain lattice-like graph, called the state-dual graph, that is used as a discretization of geographic regions in most districting analysis. This helps us better understand the complex relationship between typical properties of districting plans and the score functions designed by political districting analysts. We conclude with directions for research at the interface of statistical physics, Markov chains, and political districting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.