Paper detail

Empirical risk minimization is optimal for the convex aggregation problem

Let $F$ be a finite model of cardinality $M$ and denote by $\operatorname {conv}(F)$ its convex hull. The problem of convex aggregation is to construct a procedure having a risk as close as possible to the minimal risk over $\operatorname {conv}(F)$. Consider the bounded regression model with respect to the squared risk denoted by $R(\cdot)$. If ${\widehat{f}}_n^{\mathit{ERM-C}}$ denotes the empirical risk minimization procedure over $\operatorname {conv}(F)$, then we prove that for any $x>0$, with probability greater than $1-4\exp(-x)$, \[R({\widehat{f}}_n^{\mathit{ERM-C}})\leq\min_{f\in \operatorname {conv}(F)}R(f)+c_0\max \biggl(ψ_n^{(C)}(M),\frac{x}{n}\biggr),\] where $c_0>0$ is an absolute constant and $ψ_n^{(C)}(M)$ is the optimal rate of convex aggregation defined in (In Computational Learning Theory and Kernel Machines (COLT-2003) (2003) 303-313 Springer) by $ψ_n^{(C)}(M)=M/n$ when $M\leq \sqrt{n}$ and $ψ_n^{(C)}(M)=\sqrt{\log (\mathrm{e}M/\sqrt{n})/n}$ when $M>\sqrt{n}$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.