Paper detail

Empirical Likelihood Weighted Estimation of Average Treatment Effects

There has been growing attention on how to effectively and objectively use covariate information when the primary goal is to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In this paper, we propose an effective weighting approach to extract covariate information based on the empirical likelihood (EL) method. The resulting two-sample empirical likelihood weighted (ELW) estimator includes two classes of weights, which are obtained from a constrained empirical likelihood estimation procedure, where the covariate information is effectively incorporated into the form of general estimating equations. Furthermore, this ELW approach separates the estimation of ATE from the analysis of the covariate-outcome relationship, which implies that our approach maintains objectivity. In theory, we show that the proposed ELW estimator is semiparametric efficient. We extend our estimator to tackle the scenarios where the outcomes are missing at random (MAR), and prove the double robustness and multiple robustness properties of our estimator. Furthermore, we derive the semiparametric efficiency bound of all regular and asymptotically linear semiparametric ATE estimators under MAR mechanism and prove that our proposed estimator attains this bound. We conduct simulations to make comparisons with other existing estimators, which confirm the efficiency and multiple robustness property of our proposed ELW estimator. An application to the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 175 (ACTG 175) data is conducted.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.