Paper detail

Empirical Likelihood Estimation for Linear Regression Models with AR(p) Error Terms

Linear regression models are useful statistical tools to analyze data sets in several different fields. There are several methods to estimate the parameters of a linear regression model. These methods usually perform under normally distributed and uncorrelated errors with zero mean and constant variance. However, for some data sets error terms may not satisfy these or some of these assumptions. If error terms are correlated, such as the regression models with autoregressive (AR(p)) error terms, the Conditional Maximum Likelihood (CML) under normality assumption or the Least Square (LS) methods are often used to estimate the parameters of interest. For CML estimation a distributional assumption on error terms is needed to carry on estimation, but, in practice, such distributional assumptions on error terms may not be plausible. Therefore, in such cases some alternative distribution free methods are needed to conduct the parameter estimation. In this paper, we propose to estimate the parameters of a linear regression model with AR(p) error term using the Empirical Likelihood (EL) method, which is one of the distribution free estimation methods. A small simulation study and a numerical example are provided to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimation method over the CML method. The results of simulation study show that the proposed estimators based on EL method are remarkably better than the estimators obtained from the CML method in terms of mean squared errors (MSE) and bias in almost all the simulation configurations. These findings are also confirmed by the results of the numerical and real data examples.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.