Paper detail

Empirical Bolometric Correction Coefficients for Nearby Main-Sequence Stars in Gaia Era

Nearby detached double-lined eclipsing binaries with most accurate data were studied and 290 systems were found with at least one main-sequence component having a metallicity $0.008\leq Z\leq 0.040$. Stellar parameters, light ratios, Gaia DR2 trigonometric parallaxes, extinctions and/or reddening were investigated and only 206 systems were selected eligible to calculate empirical bolometric corrections. NASA-IPAC Galactic dust maps were main source of extinctions. Unreliable extinctions at low Galactic latitudes $|b|\leq5^o$ were replaced with individual determinations, if they exist in the literature, else associated systems are discarded. Main-sequence stars of remaining systems were used to calculate bolometric corrections ($BC$) and to calibrate $BC-T_{eff}$ relation, which is valid in the range 3100-36000 K. De-reddened $(B-V)_0$ colours, on the other hand, allowed us to calibrate two intrinsic colour effective temperature relations, where the linear one is valid for $T_{eff}>10000$ K, while the quadratic relation is valid for $T_{eff}<10000$ K, that is, both are valid in the same temperature range $BC-T_{eff}$ relation is valid. New $BC$ computed from $T_{eff}$ and other astrophysical parameters are tabulated, as well.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.