Paper detail

Empirical Bayes methods for monitoring health care quality

The paper discusses empirical Bayes methodology for repeated quality comparisons of health care institutions using data from the Dutch VOKS study that annually monitors the relative performance and quality of nearly all Dutch gynecological centres with respect to different aspects of the childbirths taking place in these centres. This paper can be seen as an extension of the pioneering work of Thomas, Longford and Rolph and Goldstein and Spiegelhalter. First of all, this paper introduces a new simple crude estimate of the centre effect in a logistic regression setting. Next, a simple estimate of the expected percentile of a centre given all data and a measure of rankability of the centres based on the expected percentiles are presented. Finally, the temporal dimension is explored and methods are discussed to predict next years performance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.