Paper detail

Emotion Recognition in Low-Resource Settings: An Evaluation of Automatic Feature Selection Methods

Research in automatic affect recognition has seldom addressed the issue of computational resource utilization. With the advent of ambient intelligence technology which employs a variety of low-power, resource-constrained devices, this issue is increasingly gaining interest. This is especially the case in the context of health and elderly care technologies, where interventions may rely on monitoring of emotional status to provide support or alert carers as appropriate. This paper focuses on emotion recognition from speech data, in settings where it is desirable to minimize memory and computational requirements. Reducing the number of features for inductive inference is a route towards this goal. In this study, we evaluate three different state-of-the-art feature selection methods: Infinite Latent Feature Selection (ILFS), ReliefF and Fisher (generalized Fisher score), and compare them to our recently proposed feature selection method named `Active Feature Selection' (AFS). The evaluation is performed on three emotion recognition data sets (EmoDB, SAVEE and EMOVO) using two standard acoustic paralinguistic feature sets (i.e. eGeMAPs and emobase). The results show that similar or better accuracy can be achieved using subsets of features substantially smaller than the entire feature set. A machine learning model trained on a smaller feature set will reduce the memory and computational resources of an emotion recognition system which can result in lowering the barriers for use of health monitoring technology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.