Paper detail

Emerging Relation Network and Task Embedding for Multi-Task Regression Problems

Multi-task learning (mtl) provides state-of-the-art results in many applications of computer vision and natural language processing. In contrast to single-task learning (stl), mtl allows for leveraging knowledge between related tasks improving prediction results on the main task (in contrast to an auxiliary task) or all tasks. However, there is a limited number of comparative studies on applying mtl architectures for regression and time series problems taking recent advances of mtl into account. An interesting, non-linear problem is the forecast of the expected power generation for renewable power plants. Therefore, this article provides a comparative study of the following recent and important mtl architectures: Hard parameter sharing, cross-stitch network, sluice network (sn). They are compared to a multi-layer perceptron model of similar size in an stl setting. Additionally, we provide a simple, yet effective approach to model task specific information through an embedding layer in an multi-layer perceptron, referred to as task embedding. Further, we introduce a new mtl architecture named emerging relation network (ern), which can be considered as an extension of the sluice network. For a solar power dataset, the task embedding achieves the best mean improvement with 14.9%. The mean improvement of the ern and the sn on the solar dataset is of similar magnitude with 14.7% and 14.8%. On a wind power dataset, only the ern achieves a significant improvement of up to 7.7%. Results suggest that the ern is beneficial when tasks are only loosely related and the prediction problem is more non-linear. Contrary, the proposed task embedding is advantageous when tasks are strongly correlated. Further, the task embedding provides an effective approach with reduced computational effort compared to other mtl architectures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.