Paper detail

Emergent quantum phases in a frustrated J1-J2 Heisenberg model on hyperhoneycomb lattice

We investigate possible quantum ground states as well as the classical limit of a frustrated J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the three-dimensional (3D) hyperhoneycomb lattice. Our study is inspired by the recent discovery of beta-Li2IrO3, where Ir^{4+} ions form a 3D network with each lattice site being connected to three nearest neighbors. We focus on the influence of magnetic frustration caused by the second-nearest neighbor spin interactions. Such interactions are likely to be significant due to large extent of 5d orbitals in iridates or other 5d transition metal oxides. In the classical limit, the ground state manifold is given by line degeneracies of the spiral magnetic-order wavevectors when J2/J1\gtrsim 0.17 while the collinear stripy order is included in the degenerate manifold when J2/J1 = 0.5. Quantum order-by-disorder effects are studied using both the semi-classical $1/S$ expansion in the spin wave theory and Schwinger boson approach. In general, certain coplanar spiral orders are chosen from the classical degenerate manifold for a large fraction of the phase diagram. Nonetheless quantum fluctuations favor the collinear stripy order over the spiral orders in an extended parameter region around J2/J1 = 0.5, despite the spin-rotation invariance of the underlying Hamiltonian. This is in contrast to the emergence of stripy order in the Heisenberg-Kitaev model studied earlier on the same lattice, where the Kitaev-type Ising interactions are important for stabilizing the stripy order. As quantum fluctuations become stronger, U(1) and Z2 quantum spin liquid phases are shown to arise via quantum disordering of the Neel, stripy and spiral magnetically-ordered phases. The effects of magnetic anisotropy and their relevance to future experiments are also discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.