Paper detail

Emergent naming conventions in a foraging robot swarm

In this study, we investigate the emergence of naming conventions within a swarm of robots that collectively forage, that is, collect resources from multiple sources in the environment. While foraging, the swarm explores the environment and makes a collective decision on how to exploit the available resources, either by selecting a single source or concurrently exploiting more than one. At the same time, the robots locally exchange messages in order to agree on how to name each source. Here, we study the correlation between the task-induced interaction network and the emergent naming conventions. In particular, our goal is to determine whether the dynamics of the interaction network are sufficient to determine an emergent vocabulary that is potentially useful to the robot swarm. To be useful, linguistic conventions need to be compact and meaningful, that is, to be the minimal description of the relevant features of the environment and of the made collective decision. We show that, in order to obtain a useful vocabulary, the task-dependent interaction network alone is not sufficient but it must be combined with a correlation between language and foraging dynamics. On the basis of these results, we propose a decentralised algorithm for collective categorisation which enables the swarm to achieve a useful -- compact and meaningful -- naming of all the available sources. Understanding how useful linguistic conventions emerge contributes to the design of robot swarms with potentially improved autonomy, flexibility, and self-awareness.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.