Paper detail

Elucidating the mechanism of reactive uptake of N$_2$O$_5$ in aqueous aerosol

Nearly one third of all nitrogen oxides are removed from the atmosphere through the reactive uptake of N$_2$O$_5$ into aqueous aerosol. The primary step in reactive uptake is the rapid hydrolysis of N$_2$O$_5$, yet despite significant study, the mechanism and rate of this process are unknown. Here we use machine learning-based reactive many body potentials and methods of importance sampling molecular dynamics simulations to study the solvation and subsequent hydrolysis of N$_2$O$_5$. We find that hydrolysis to nitric acid proceeds through the coordinated fluctuation of intramolecular charge separation and solvation, and its characteristic rate is 4.1 ns$^{-1}$, orders of magnitude faster than traditionally assumed. This large rate calls into question standard models of reactive uptake that envision local equilibration between the gas and the bulk solution. We propose an alternative model based on interfacial reactivity that can explain existing experimental observations and is corroborated by explicit simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.