Paper detail

$\ell^p$-improving inequalities for Discrete Spherical Averages

Let $ λ^2 \in \mathbb N $, and in dimensions $ d\geq 5$, let $ A_{λ} f (x)$ denote the average of $ f \;:\; \mathbb Z ^{d} \to \mathbb R $ over the lattice points on the sphere of radius $λ$ centered at $x$. We prove $ \ell ^{p}$ improving properties of $ A_{λ}$. \begin{equation*} \lVert A_{λ}\rVert_{\ell ^{p} \to \ell ^{p&#39;}} \leq C_{d,p, ω(λ^2 )} λ^{d ( 1-\frac{2}p)}, \qquad \tfrac{d-1}{d+1} < p \leq \frac{d} {d-2}. \end{equation*} It holds in dimension $ d =4$ for odd $ λ^2 $. The dependence is in terms of $ ω(λ^2 )$, the number of distinct prime factors of $ λ^2 $. These inequalities are discrete versions of a classical inequality of Littman and Strichartz on the $ L ^{p}$ improving property of spherical averages on $ \mathbb R ^{d}$, in particular they are scale free, in a natural sense. The proof uses the decomposition of the corresponding multiplier whose properties were established by Magyar-Stein-Wainger, and Magyar. We then use a proof strategy of Bourgain, which dominates each part of the decomposition by an endpoint estimate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.