Paper detail

Electroweak renormalization based on gauge-invariant vacuum expectation values

We briefly review a recently proposed scheme for a gauge-invariant treatment of tadpole corrections in spontaneously broken gauge theories called Gauge-Invariant Vacuum expectation value Scheme (GIVS). The tadpole scheme matters in higher-order predictions of observables if not all free parameters are fixed by renormalization conditions based on S-matrix elements, such as in MSbar renormalization. In contrast to previously used tadpole schemes, the GIVS unifies the properties of gauge invariance and perturbative stability. The application of the GIVS to the Standard Model, for instance, leads to very moderate electroweak corrections in the conversion of on-shell-renormalized to MSbar-renormalized masses. Moreover, in models with extended Higgs sectors, the GIVS is less prone to perturbative instabilities in the MSbar renormalization of Higgs mixing angles than observed for the traditional gauge-independent tadpole treatment. We illustrate this by considering the next-to-leading-order (electroweak and QCD) corrections to the decay processes $h/H\to WW/ZZ\to4$fermions of the CP-even neutral Higgs bosons h and H in a singlet Higgs extension of the Standard Model and in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.